Now that a stake has been driven through the heart of healthcare “reform” how will Obama spin it?

Now that a stake has been driven through the heart of healthcare “reform” how will Obama spin it?

Question by Cactus Jack: Now that a stake has been driven through the heart of healthcare “reform” how will Obama spin it?
Geez, the Dems control the White House, Senate and House of Reps! Can’t they get anything passed? And the old “obstructionist Republicans” hue and cry will blow up in his face like a loaded cigar.

Best answer:

Answer by chuck_junior
They’ll keep trying to ram it through as amendments to other bills. Same crap they tried with illegal immigration 3 different times…or was it 4? We started calling that one “Kill Bill Parts 1,2,3,4.”

Give your answer to this question below!

11 Replies to “Now that a stake has been driven through the heart of healthcare “reform” how will Obama spin it?”

  1. He’ll probably spin the healtcare defeat into a message that its defeat is responsible for the continuing job losses.

    “If health care had passed, we’d all be working now and rich” Pfff

    If that doesn’t work, blame Bush.

  2. you must be so happy! i’m sure you’ll back off now, appreciate our democratic system, and realize that obama’s not a tyrannical communist

    interesting. you’re not changing your mind either.

    loose nuts, are you implying that obama is going to hike health care rates? i thought the whole point of killing the healthcare bill was to keep health insurance private

  3. Sadly, Reps and Dems are in the pocket of lobbyists and big healthcare. Millions are given to politicians; they are very hesitant to vote against their gravy train.

  4. You are seeing rate increases of up to 39% in some places for health care policies.
    I hope yours is locked in.

    You will see the increases and they will be blamed on the Republican obstruction of reform.
    This will cost Republicans seats in the midterm elections, but more importantly after people are totally angry about it the Democrats will introduce the bill again and pass whatever they want.
    They might even make it into an election issue for 2112.

    I hope the Republicans stick to their guns on this one.
    (Recession, loss of health care, Tea Party….)

    What happened in 2008 will look like consensual casual sex compared to the raping the Republicans are going to receive next time around.

  5. […] And if you have a few spare minutes to read, here are our recommendations to keep a right perspective this Christmas season. To be reminded of the real reason we celebrate, read Sarah’s ‘Nothing Else Matters.’ To get a right perspective on giving, read Gabby’s ‘Heart of a Hoarder.’ To remember God in the midst of the holiday hustle and bustle, read Katie’s ‘Mission Impossible: The Solitary Silence of a Quieted Heart.’ To keep a grateful heart in the midst of materialism and a down economy, read Diane’s ‘A Healthy Heart is a Thankful Heart.’ […]

  6. To boil down the question further: what does it mean for a particle, such as a photon, to *be* in a superposition of spin-up and spin-down? How is it “both”?

    You draw a distinction between act and being. Does it apply here? Can spin-up and spin-down be seen as acts of the photon which can somehow co-occur? Because the only way I can think of permitting a photon in “be-ing” spin-up and spin-down is we discard the idea that spin is the genus, and spin-up and spin-down the species, and elevate spin-up and spin-down to genera each of which contain only one species (themselves), thus breaking spin into two aspects to avoid contradiction. However, it is not immediately clear to me, without giving it some more thought and a little research, that such a division of spin into two parts is permitted by QM.

Leave a Reply